As I've been saying throughout this blog and website, these two are, in fact, natural pairs while at the same time unnatural--they are aberrations, deviations that have become perversely normative. Jon Ronson, author of The Men Who Stare at Goats and The Psychopath Test, gets it exactly right in this wonderfully concise 3 minute interview.
I'm strangely, surprisingly, even joyfully proud of my city this morning. And not a little choked up.
We've rallied around justice and thrown out Donald Trump, a hate-mongering fascist. And we've done it peacefully. I'm proud of the people of Chicago, who came together at a moment's notice and organized so well. I'm especially proud of the passionate young organizers, especially the University of IL at Chicago students, whose Social Justice work is bearing fruit, a harvest of seeds planted by Jane Addams and others nearly 100 years ago.
God bless them, and Godspeed to us all...
Financial despair, addiction and the rise of suicide in white America
The death rate for white Americans aged 45 to 54 has risen sharply since 1999, but Montana officials wrestle to explain reasons why the state has the highest rate of suicide in the US at nearly twice the national average – and it’s rising
Chris McGreal in Butte, Montana
Sunday 7 February 201608.28 EST
The primary function of an economy is to enable people to live. In every respect, ours has been a complete and utter failure.
original essay posted April 2013
The comfort of the rich depends on an abundant supply of the poor. -Voltaire
In the comic hit movie, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, Mike Myers’ Fat Bastard character—who, as you might expect is always hungry—turns to Mini-me and demands, in his bellowing mock-Scottish bravado, “I’m bigger than you—and higher up the food chain. Get in my belly!” And then licks his chops while singing, “ba…ba..ba…baby back, baby back ribs…”
Perhaps this is a telling example of being utterly absorbed in, and confused by one’s worldview. Mini-me simply scoots away, of course, ironically into the loving arms of Dr. Evil, leaving Fat Bastard un-sated, yet nevertheless still deliriously full of himself.
Despite appearances—and our hubristic bravado—we humans “on the top of the food chain” are actually the most dependent beings in existence—we rely on everyone and everything “below” us. Author Michael Pollan’s lengthy and eye-opening essay for the NYT Magazine, “Some of My Best Friends are Germs”, reveals to us that we humans are, in reality, a mere 10% ourselves, the other 90% is actually an ongoing project of other beings, primarily bacteria and microorganisms going about their business. But for them we’d be nearly-nothing.
So what sense does it make to imagine ourselves at the top of anything? Don’t we ordinarily think of dependant beings at some sort of bottom? The child and the invalid are dependent on their caretakers. So too are we humans dependent on the entire structure of ecology—which, as we are just beginning to understand, includes not just the flora and fauna all around us, but other people too. Perhaps we can understand Max Ehrmann’s line from the Desiderata in a new way. “You are a child of the universe…” indeed.
And wealth works similarly, reflecting in parallel the imagined hierarchy we impose on Nature. The wealthy suffer hallucinations, seeing themselves as independent, as above everyone else. But in reality, the wealthy are wholly dependent on all of the people “below” them, from their own workers to the teachers who educated those workers, to the people who maintain and operate buildings, the means of transportation, systems of exchange and so on, and on and on…
The wealthy are utterly dependent on the entire infrastructure of nature/culture--they are dependants—more so than any other economic strata. Now this is not hard to imagine. Donald Trump is far more dependent on the Panama Canal, for example, than anyone you know.
The wealthy are not inter-reliant; the wealthy are held aloft by the compliance and work and servitude of others—some of whom they pay, or exploit, or from whom they simply receive unacknowledged and unearned benefits. Yet many strut about the world, full of themselves, like Fat Bastard (s), as if they fashioned it all from their own hands.
Thus, shouldn’t we think of the wealthy as residing at the bottom of our society? And therefore, shouldn’t they be treated just like many of them treat the poor? Reality is a bitch!
Of course I’m just having fun. We certainly can’t cure dystopia with the hubris that created it. We need to treat the rich the way most of us try to treat the poor: we help them because we feel for them. Most of us are chock-full of empathy, even if it doesn’t show that often. For me, the older I get—the more I’ve seen—the more I cry, as if the world has been waiting for me to notice.
We need to dismantle the illusory hierarchy that incents the wealthy towards destructive hubris, leaving them empathically poor and all of us poorer, so we can welcome them into human inter-dependency. As Thict Nhat Hanh might say, such a generous and compassionate act could bring multiple benefits; to those helping as well as to those helped. Who knows how far that wind may blow?
How do we help the wealthy and ourselves at the same time? We refuse to participate in their charade. We drop out of their hierarchically structured economy and build a new one that acknowledges our dependence on each other and all others. This may take the form of public banking, co-ops and so on. The world is a rich place for ideas. It will certainly require new and stronger relationships with each other, and the natural world.
But to unlock real creativity and enable a critical and kinetic mass, first we have to be unchained from the hegemony of imagined hierarchy. We have to begin to see more clearly. Humans are the most dependant beings, and the wealthy are the most dependant humans.
The older I get the more I come to understand that reality is the opposite of the proffered convention—this because the profferers of convention have a vested interest in making and keeping the world structured just so. There was no vote on this. The poor suffer a lack of justice, which is what Voltaire meant when he said: The comfort of the rich depends on an abundant supply of the poor.
But willful poverty, as both a personal and political act, is something to be achieved—or better, it is something to be created as one might make art from detritus. Finding satiety for yourself, and providing satiety for others, is a means and ends united; the wholeness of the individual secure in the inter-reliance of the community.
Not that it will be easy. Yet it is a necessary dismantling of the hierarchy that is itself a direct cause of suffering and planetary degradation.
Free from the servitude that feeds Fat Bastard, the willful poor weaken him and are empowered to seek authentic concert with the world—real relationships with each other and the ecosystem—and thereby change the world.
January 10, 2016
 Some of My Best Friends are Germs, Michael Pollan, NYT Magazine May 15, 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/19/magazine/say-hello-to-the-100-trillion-bacteria-that-make-up-your-microbiome.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 accessed June 13, 2013
Twas the night before Christmas
but up on Wall Street
the bankers still looked
for signs of fresh meat.
"Santa, give us a city
that we might bleed dry
with complex fixed rate swaps
and a good alibi!"
But when Santa arrived
he was not amused
at the number of cities
Wall Street had abused.
"Ho ho ho," Santa laughed
"You're all in the tank.
What each city needs
is a good public bank!"
And out of his bag
Santa pulled with much glee
a bank for every
And I heard him exclaim
amidst bankers' sad looks,
and bypass these crooks!"
Happiest of holidays from the Public Banking Institute, and thank you for a wonderful and productive 2015. See the announcements at the bottom of this news blast on two ways you can help PBI during the holidays!
partial repost from Alternet/Truthdig:
Chris Hedges: We Must Refuse to Participate in the Destruction of the Planet
By Chris Hedges  / Truthdig 
December 7, 2015
The charade of the 21st United Nations climate summit  will end, as past climate summits have ended, with lofty rhetoric and ineffectual cosmetic reforms. Since the first summit more than 20 years ago, carbon dioxide emissions have soared. Placing faith in our political and economic elites, who have mastered the arts of duplicity and propaganda on behalf of corporate power, is the triumph of hope over experience. There are only a few ways left to deal honestly with climate change: sustained civil disobedience that disrupts the machinery of exploitation; preparing for the inevitable dislocations and catastrophes that will come from irreversible rising temperatures; and cutting our personal carbon footprints, which means drastically reducing our consumption, particularly of animal products.
“Our civilization,” Dr. Richard Oppenlander  writes in “Food Choice and Sustainability,” “displays a curious instinct when confronted with a problem related to overconsumption—we simply find a way to produce more of what it is we are consuming, instead of limiting or stopping that consumption.”
The global elites have no intention of interfering with the profits, or ending government subsidies, for the fossil fuel industry and the extraction industries. They will not curtail extraction or impose hefty carbon taxes to keep fossil fuels in the ground. They will not limit the overconsumption that is the engine of global capitalism. They act as if the greatest contributor of greenhouse gases—the animal agriculture industry—does not exist. They siphon off trillions of dollars and employ scientific and technical expertise—expertise that should be directed toward preparing for environmental catastrophe and investing in renewable energy—to wage endless wars in the Middle East. What they airily hold out as a distant solution to the crisis—wind turbines and solar panels—is, as the scientist James Lovelock  says, the equivalent of 18th-century doctors attempting to cure serious diseases with leeches and mercury. And as the elites mouth platitudes about saving the climate they are shoving still another trade agreement, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), down our throats. The TPP permits corporations to ignore nonbinding climate accords made at conferences such as the one in Paris, and it allows them, in secret trade tribunals, to defy environmental regulations imposed by individual states.
New technology—fracking, fuel-efficient vehicles or genetically modified food—is not about curbing overconsumption or conserving resources. It is about ensuring that consumption continues at unsustainable levels. Technological innovation, employed to build systems of greater and greater complexity, has fragmented society into cadres of specialists. The expertise of each of these specialists is limited to a small section of the elaborate technological, scientific and bureaucratic machinery that drives corporate capitalism forward—much as in the specialized bureaucratic machinery that defined the genocide carried out by the Nazis. These technocrats are part of the massive, unthinking hive that makes any system work, even a system of death. They lack the intellectual and moral capacity to question the doomsday machine spawned by global capitalism. And they are in control.
Civilizations careening toward collapse create ever more complex structures, and more intricate specialization, to exploit diminishing resources. But eventually the resources are destroyed or exhausted. The systems and technologies designed to exploit these resources become useless. Economists call such a phenomenon the “Jevons paradox.”  The result is systems collapse.
Continue reading here
“Never forget that justice is what love looks like in public”